TY - JOUR
T1 - Human preparedness
T2 - Relational infrastructures and medical countermeasures in Sierra Leone
AU - Lee, Shona J.
AU - Vernooij, Eva
AU - Enria, Luisa
AU - Kelly, Ann H.
AU - Rogers, James
AU - Ansumana, Rashid
AU - Bangura, Mahmood H.
AU - Lees, Shelley
AU - Street, Alice
N1 - Funding Information:
Research for this paper was supported by the Scottish Funding Council SFC-GCRF Covid-19 Urgency Fund. DiaDev was supported by the European Research Council under the Horizon 2020 European Union research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 715450). EBOVAC has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative under grant agreement No 800176. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Association. The authors wish to thank all of the laboratory and project staff in Sierra Leone interviewed by DiaDev and EBOVAC for their willingness to share their experiences and invaluable insights. We extend our deepest gratitude to our colleagues and research team with EBOVAC for facilitating this research, particularly Dr David Ishola, Abdul Deen, Kadiatu Bangura, Rosetta Kabia, and Alhaji Nyakoi. We are thankful for the support of the Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation and King’s Sierra Leone Partnership of the DiaDev project, and thank Momoh Gbetuwa, Mambu Momoh, Dr Isatta Wurie and Dr Fenella Beynon for facilitating introductions to lab staff and health workers involved in the Ebola response. Conceptualisation, S. J. L., A. S.; methodology, S. J. L., E. V., L. E., S. L., A. S.; formal analysis, S. J. L., E. V., A. S.; investigation, S. J. L., E. V.; writing—original draft preparation, S. J. L., E. V., A. S.; writing—review and editing, all authors; funding acquisition, S. L., A. S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This paper examines health worker experiences in two areas of post-epidemic preparedness in Sierra Leone–vaccine trials and laboratory strengthening–to reflect on the place of people in current models of epidemic response. Drawing on ethnographic research and interviews with health workers in the aftermath of Ebola, it explores the hopes and expectations that interventions foster for frontline workers in under-resourced health systems, and describes the unseen work involved in sustaining robust response infrastructures. Our analysis focuses on what it means for the people who sustain health systems in an emergency to be ‘prepared’ for an epidemic. Human preparedness entails more than the presence of a labour force; it involves building and maintaining ‘relational infrastructures’, often fragile social and moral relationships between health workers, publics, governments, and international organisations. The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the value of rethinking human resources from an anthropological perspective, and investing in the safety and support of people at the forefront of response. In describing the labour, personal losses, and social risks undertaken by frontline workers for protocols and practicality to meet in an emergency context, we describe the social process of preparedness; that is, the contextual engineering and investment that make response systems work.
AB - This paper examines health worker experiences in two areas of post-epidemic preparedness in Sierra Leone–vaccine trials and laboratory strengthening–to reflect on the place of people in current models of epidemic response. Drawing on ethnographic research and interviews with health workers in the aftermath of Ebola, it explores the hopes and expectations that interventions foster for frontline workers in under-resourced health systems, and describes the unseen work involved in sustaining robust response infrastructures. Our analysis focuses on what it means for the people who sustain health systems in an emergency to be ‘prepared’ for an epidemic. Human preparedness entails more than the presence of a labour force; it involves building and maintaining ‘relational infrastructures’, often fragile social and moral relationships between health workers, publics, governments, and international organisations. The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the value of rethinking human resources from an anthropological perspective, and investing in the safety and support of people at the forefront of response. In describing the labour, personal losses, and social risks undertaken by frontline workers for protocols and practicality to meet in an emergency context, we describe the social process of preparedness; that is, the contextual engineering and investment that make response systems work.
KW - Ebola
KW - epidemic response
KW - health worker
KW - preparedness
KW - Sierra Leone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139155962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rgph20
U2 - 10.1080/17441692.2022.2110917
DO - 10.1080/17441692.2022.2110917
M3 - Article
C2 - 36168658
AN - SCOPUS:85139155962
SN - 1744-1692
VL - 17
SP - 4129
EP - 4145
JO - Global public health
JF - Global public health
IS - 12
ER -