Humility, listening and 'teaching in a strong sense'

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


My argument in this paper is that humility is implied in the concept of teaching, if teaching is construed in a strong sense. Teaching in a strong sense is a view of teaching as linked to students’ embodied experiences (including cognitive and moral-social dimensions), in particular students’ experiences of limitation, whereas a weak sense of teaching refers to teaching as narrowly focused on student cognitive development. In addition to detailing the relation between humility and strong sense teaching, I will also argue that humility is acquired through the practice of teaching. My discussion connects to the growing interest, especially in virtue epistemology discourse, in the idea that teachers should educate for virtues. Drawing upon John Dewey and contemporary virtue epistemology discourse, I discuss humility, paying particular attention to an overlooked aspect of humility that I refer to as the educative dimension of humility. I then connect this concept of humility to the notion of teaching in a strong sense. In the final section, I discuss how humility in teaching is learned in the practice of teaching by listening to students in particular ways. In addition, I make connections between my concept of teaching and the practice of cultivating students’ virtues. I conclude with a critique of common practices of evaluating good teaching, which I situate within the context of international educational policy on teacher evaluation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)529-554
Number of pages26
JournalLogos and Episteme
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 29 Dec 2016


  • humility
  • listening
  • teaching evaluation
  • teaching
  • educational policy
  • John Dewey
  • virtue epistemology
  • teacher evaluation policy


Dive into the research topics of 'Humility, listening and 'teaching in a strong sense''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this