'IJPR: beyond the limit and limiting the beyond'

Michael Purcell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is now almost 20 years since Janicaud's critique of the 'theological turn in French phenomenology' (Janicaud 1991, 2000), with its emphasis on phenomenology and theology as two and never one. Yet since that time there been an explosion of phenomenologies which are, if not overtly, implicitly religious and phenomenology. Thus, we have phenomenologies of prayer, or love, or hope, and the possibilities of further phenomenologies. The challenge of these emerging phenomenologies is that there seems to be no noematic correlate to a noesis in intentionality. To the fore in the reconsideration of this phenomenological challenge is Jean-Luc Marion (although there are others such as Levinas, Jean-Louis Chr,tien, and Michel Henry): all aspects of lived experience appear now to belong to the proper scope of phenomenology. Marion considers the relation in Husserl between intentions and intuitions which fulfil these intentions, and suggests a reversal. In Marion, although intentionality is not rejected, the phenomenological flow which the reduction brings to light is from the object as such as it gives itself in intuition, and then from intuition to intention. For Marion, phenomena are saturated-they give too much. Religion becomes a test-case for all phenomenology. This bearing, drawing mainly on The Visible and the Revealed, offers some of the key things in Marion's phenomenology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-138
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Volume68
Issue number1-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Keywords

  • Phenomenology
  • Religion
  • Theology
  • Jean-Luc Marion
  • Intentionality
  • Donation
  • Saturation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''IJPR: beyond the limit and limiting the beyond''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this