Image Training, Using Random Images of Melanoma, Performs as Well as the ABC(D) Criteria in Enabling Novices to Distinguish Between Melanoma and Mimics of Melanoma

Karen Robertson, R D McIntosh, Cerys Bradley-Scott, S MacFarlane, Jonathan L Rees

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Robust experimental evidence supporting many attempts to facilitate early melanoma diagnosis is lacking. In an experimental study using a browser interface we have examined diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of novices in distinguishing between melanomas and mimics of melanoma. We show that rule-based ABC methods and image training, based on random images of melanoma, improve specificity to similar degrees, with-out effects on sensitivity, leading to small improvements in overall accuracy. There was a significant effect of age with older subjects performing better. Although both the ABC method and image training groups showed improved performance over the control group, overall performance was poor. For instance, for a task in which 1 in 4 test images was a melanoma, and 3 out of 4 benign, both interventions (ABC or image training) increased accuracy from the control value of 53% to around 61%. For reference, dermatology trainees performed at a much higher level of accuracy. Our study provides little support for the use of such methods in public education, but suggests ways in which performance might be improved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-70
Number of pages6
JournalActa Dermato-Venereologica
Volume94
Issue number3
Early online date8 Nov 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 May 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Image Training, Using Random Images of Melanoma, Performs as Well as the ABC(D) Criteria in Enabling Novices to Distinguish Between Melanoma and Mimics of Melanoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this