TY - JOUR
T1 - Impairments of trunk movements following left or right hemisphere lesions
T2 - dissociation between apraxic errors and postural instability
AU - Spinazzola, Lucia
AU - Cubelli, Roberto
AU - Della Sala, Sergio
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - Stroke patients present with apraxic or postural deficits involving trunk movements. Praxis and posture control have been associated with the functions of the left and the right hemisphere, respectively. For the first time, in this study the occurrence of apraxic and postural components in trunk movement deficits following right and left hemisphere lesions were investigated in the same participants. Twenty-three patients with left (L/pt), 12 with right (R/pt) hemisphere lesion, and 30 healthy controls were evaluated with a 21-item test assessing the imitation of meaningless, symbolic and reaching movements presented twice on visual or proprioceptive modality. Erroneous, motor responses of the trunk were classified as postural (compensations to overcome stability or asymmetry deficits) or apraxic (execution errors not due to biomechanical constraints). Postural instability reactions were significantly more frequent among the R/pts, whilst apraxic responses were overwhelming within the L/pts. The findings are consistent with the view that the left hemisphere is dominant for praxis and suggest that this dominance be extended to trunk praxis. The results also support the hypothesis that trunk postures are coded in relation to the environment by a representational system. A widespread network, mainly sitting in the right hemisphere, subserves this postural system. The distinction between praxic and postural deficits in executing trunk movements should be kept in mind when evaluating trunk movement difficulties shown by stroke patients, in following up their recovery or when tailoring rehabilitation programmes.
AB - Stroke patients present with apraxic or postural deficits involving trunk movements. Praxis and posture control have been associated with the functions of the left and the right hemisphere, respectively. For the first time, in this study the occurrence of apraxic and postural components in trunk movement deficits following right and left hemisphere lesions were investigated in the same participants. Twenty-three patients with left (L/pt), 12 with right (R/pt) hemisphere lesion, and 30 healthy controls were evaluated with a 21-item test assessing the imitation of meaningless, symbolic and reaching movements presented twice on visual or proprioceptive modality. Erroneous, motor responses of the trunk were classified as postural (compensations to overcome stability or asymmetry deficits) or apraxic (execution errors not due to biomechanical constraints). Postural instability reactions were significantly more frequent among the R/pts, whilst apraxic responses were overwhelming within the L/pts. The findings are consistent with the view that the left hemisphere is dominant for praxis and suggest that this dominance be extended to trunk praxis. The results also support the hypothesis that trunk postures are coded in relation to the environment by a representational system. A widespread network, mainly sitting in the right hemisphere, subserves this postural system. The distinction between praxic and postural deficits in executing trunk movements should be kept in mind when evaluating trunk movement difficulties shown by stroke patients, in following up their recovery or when tailoring rehabilitation programmes.
U2 - 10.1093/brain/awg266
DO - 10.1093/brain/awg266
M3 - Article
C2 - 12937080
SN - 0006-8950
VL - 126
SP - 2656
EP - 2666
JO - Brain
JF - Brain
IS - Pt 12
ER -