Abstract
Background: The internet has become a place of increased risk of abuse, including sexual abuse, for young people (YP). One potential risk factor to online abuse and exploitation is the ability to mentalise. We developed the i-Minds app, a mentalisation-based digital health intervention (DHI) for YP who have experienced technology assisted sexual abuse (TASA), which we tested in a clinical feasibility trial. Nested within the trial was a qualitative implementation study with clinicians who referred to the trial.
Objective: To explore the barriers and enablers to the future integration of i-Minds into clinical practice.
Participants and setting: Twelve HCPs were recruited from across two trial recruitment sites (Manchester and Edinburgh).
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were informed by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). Framework analysis was used; transcripts were coded deductively to NPT constructs.
Results: Practitioners were positive about the need for, and added value of, the i-Minds app over existing interventions, including other DHIs. While they felt confident with the app, concerns remained around the safety of using the app without practitioner support. i-Minds promoted changes in practitioners’ work and impacted online behaviour of YP. There was an identified need for further training and organisational support.
Conclusions: Practitioners are aware of TASA but have limited knowledge, skills and tools to work with TASA in clinical practice with YP. There is a need for awareness raising and education about TASA and DHI. i-Minds offers a theory-informed DHI for working with YP exposed to TASA that is acceptable to practitioners and YP.
Objective: To explore the barriers and enablers to the future integration of i-Minds into clinical practice.
Participants and setting: Twelve HCPs were recruited from across two trial recruitment sites (Manchester and Edinburgh).
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were informed by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). Framework analysis was used; transcripts were coded deductively to NPT constructs.
Results: Practitioners were positive about the need for, and added value of, the i-Minds app over existing interventions, including other DHIs. While they felt confident with the app, concerns remained around the safety of using the app without practitioner support. i-Minds promoted changes in practitioners’ work and impacted online behaviour of YP. There was an identified need for further training and organisational support.
Conclusions: Practitioners are aware of TASA but have limited knowledge, skills and tools to work with TASA in clinical practice with YP. There is a need for awareness raising and education about TASA and DHI. i-Minds offers a theory-informed DHI for working with YP exposed to TASA that is acceptable to practitioners and YP.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 106883 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-12 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Child Abuse and Neglect |
Volume | 154 |
Early online date | 12 Jun 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2024 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- adolescent
- mobile applications
- feasibility studies
- risk factors
- internet
- health care practitioners