Abstract
Several attempts to model the NEO PI-R/NEO-FFI as a FFM have failed to achieve adequate CFA model fit, which has prompted some personality researchers to suggest serious problems with SEM. In this paper, it was hypothesized that a portion of the model misfit associated with the NEO-FFI may be due to intra-dimensional correlated residuals, which was expected to result in upwardly biased estimates of internal consistency reliability. Based on a latent variable modeling approach to the estimation of internal consistency reliability, the degree of reliability overestimation was found to range from .02 to.06. Because the consequences can have implications for internal consistency reliability estimation, it is recommended that researchers attend to evidence of model misfit, rather than dismissing the issue as a problem with SEM. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1051-1062 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Personality and Individual Differences |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2007 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- confirmatory factor analysis
- personality
- NEO-FFI
- model-misfit
- CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS
- PERSONALITY-INVENTORY
- BIG 5
- COEFFICIENT ALPHA
- SCALE