Improving classification of psychoses

Stephen M. Lawrie*, Michael C. O'Donovan, Elyn Saks, Tom Burns, Jeffrey A. Lieberman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Psychosis has been recognised as an abnormal state in need of care throughout history and by diverse cultures. Present classifications of psychotic disorder remain based on the presence of specific psychotic symptoms, relative to affective and other symptoms, and their sequence and duration. Although extant diagnostic classifications have restricted validity, they have proven reliability and most clinicians and some patients find them useful. Moreover, these classifications have yet to be replaced by anything better. We propose that an expansion of the subgrouping approach inherent to classification will provide incremental improvement to present diagnostic constructs-as has worked in the rest of medicine. We also propose that subgroups could be created both within and across present diagnostic classifications, taking into consideration the potential value of continuous measures (eg, duration of psychotic symptoms and intelligence quotient). Health-care workers also need to work with service users and carers to develop and adapt approaches to diagnosis that are seen as helpful.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-374
Number of pages8
JournalThe Lancet Psychiatry
Volume3
Issue number4
Early online date6 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving classification of psychoses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this