TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving Decision Support Tools for Quantifying GHG Emissions from Organic Production Systems
AU - Schipanski, Meagan E.
AU - McClelland, Shelby C.
AU - Hughes, Helen M.
AU - Jabbour, Randa
AU - Malin, Daniella
AU - Hillier, Jonathan
AU - Paustian, Keith
AU - Reaves, Elizabeth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/4/26
Y1 - 2024/4/26
N2 - As food companies have adopted sustainability metrics to quantify the environmental impacts of supply chains, we need data-driven decision support tools that represent organic management practices. Decision support tools such as COMET-Farm and the Cool Farm Tool have been developed to estimate management practice impacts on soil carbon and greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural systems, but these tools have primarily been developed and used to evaluate conventional management systems. We provide an overview of the research, outreach, and educational activities used to improve these tools to better integrate organic management practices with a focus on cover crops. We summarize our previously published findings from a meta-analysis of the average potential soil carbon benefits of cover crops in temperate climates that identified planting window, biomass production, and soil texture as important predictors of cover crop soil carbon outcomes. We demonstrate how these findings were applied to improvements in process-based models and the parameterization of empirical models. In addition, we solicited feedback from organic community members on the utility of these tools and identified barriers to adoption. Finally, we evaluated both tools as resources for teaching undergraduate students about organic management systems and their impacts on greenhouse gas emissions. While both tools contain a range of customizable, organic amendment options, grazing management options still need further improvement. These improved decision support systems can help identify opportunities for enhancing the sustainability of organic systems.
AB - As food companies have adopted sustainability metrics to quantify the environmental impacts of supply chains, we need data-driven decision support tools that represent organic management practices. Decision support tools such as COMET-Farm and the Cool Farm Tool have been developed to estimate management practice impacts on soil carbon and greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural systems, but these tools have primarily been developed and used to evaluate conventional management systems. We provide an overview of the research, outreach, and educational activities used to improve these tools to better integrate organic management practices with a focus on cover crops. We summarize our previously published findings from a meta-analysis of the average potential soil carbon benefits of cover crops in temperate climates that identified planting window, biomass production, and soil texture as important predictors of cover crop soil carbon outcomes. We demonstrate how these findings were applied to improvements in process-based models and the parameterization of empirical models. In addition, we solicited feedback from organic community members on the utility of these tools and identified barriers to adoption. Finally, we evaluated both tools as resources for teaching undergraduate students about organic management systems and their impacts on greenhouse gas emissions. While both tools contain a range of customizable, organic amendment options, grazing management options still need further improvement. These improved decision support systems can help identify opportunities for enhancing the sustainability of organic systems.
KW - Climate change mitigation
KW - Cover crop
KW - Metrics
KW - Models
KW - Soil carbon
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85191266428
U2 - 10.1007/s13165-024-00466-5
DO - 10.1007/s13165-024-00466-5
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85191266428
SN - 1879-4238
VL - 14
SP - 503
EP - 512
JO - Organic Agriculture
JF - Organic Agriculture
IS - 4
ER -