Abstract
In this paper I advance three interconnected arguments that explore the relation between gentrification generalized and the generalization of indebtedness. First, I show how the availability of credit liberates potential land values from social constraints. Second, I suggest that debt functions as a form of class discipline, imbuing the proliferation of gentrification with a coercive impetus. Third, I argue that the generalization of indebtedness should reframe the way that class is theorized in contemporary debates on gentrification. I conclude by returning to the rent gap model, arguing that it remains a vital tool for understanding gentrification, but only if its sense of time is blown wide open. Through these four strands, I argue that debt should change the way we think of gentrification, both as a concept to be explained and a process to be resisted.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-12 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Urban Affairs |
Volume | N/A |
Early online date | 3 Jun 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 3 Jun 2020 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'In debt to the rent gap: Gentrification generalized and the frontier of the future'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Hamish Kallin
- School of Geosciences - Lectureship in Human Geography
Person: Academic: Research Active (Teaching)