Infographic. Walking on sunshine: Scoping review of the evidence for walking and mental health

The link between physical activity and better mental health is well established.1 2 However, substantially less is known about the relationships between walking and mental health.3 Morris and Hardman identified this gap in their seminal ‘Walking to Health’ paper in 1997 and stated that ‘The pleasurable and therapeutic, psychological and social dimensions of walking, whilst evident, have been surprisingly little studied’.4

Walking is an accessible, population-level behaviour conducted by persons of all ages and sexes, and as such one with great public health potential.5 6 Understanding the extent that walking is associated with better mental health is important for focusing health promotion efforts.

Therefore, we aimed to scope the literature to provide an overview of what has been learnt since ‘Walking to Health’ in 1997 in regard to preventing mental ill-being, promoting mental well-being and the effects of walking interventions. We also aimed to highlight current evidence gaps and research priorities.

Our scoping review identified five systematic reviews and 50 individual papers that addressed walking and mental health, showing that the evidence base had grown steadily since 1997.7 The main findings are presented in this Infographic. For depression, systematic review evidence showed consistent preventive and intervention effects. For anxiety, there were no systematic reviews, but multiple studies showed consistent preventive and intervention effects. For these outcomes, there may be sufficient evidence to promote walking to prevent and treat these conditions.

Evidence for psychological stress, psychological well-being, subjective well-being and social isolation and loneliness was more fragmented and varied in volume and nature of studies, and effectiveness of walking, but no harmful effects were identified. There were no studies for walking and resilience. It was apparent that there has been more research on the negative disease based outcomes (such as depression and anxiety) than for the positive well-being outcomes (such as happiness or subjective well-being).

The setting and context of walking seem to be important variables. The evidence base suggests that across the mental health outcomes there are additional benefits from walking outdoors in natural environments compared with indoor, treadmill-based walking.7 Importantly, the traditional descriptors of physical activity dosage (ie, frequency, intensity, duration) may not be the only determinants of mental health outcomes when considering walking.

We anticipate that this scoping review will stimulate more research in the area of walking and mental health. Policy, national guidelines and practitioners should promote the known mental health benefits of increased walking, and future research should directly address the gaps we have identified.