Inhibitors and supporters of policy change in the regulation of unhealthy food marketing in Australia

Yandisa Ngqangashe*, Sirinya Phulkerd, Ashley Schram, Jeff Collin, Carmen Huckel Schneider, Anne Marie Thow, Sharon Friel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Background: Evidence on the impact of policies that regulate unhealthy food marketing demonstrates a need for a shift from pure industry self-regulation toward statutory regulation. Institutional rules, decision-making procedures, actor practices, and institutional norms influence the regulatory choices made by policy-makers. This study examined institutional processes that sustain, support, or inhibit change in the food marketing regulation in Australia using the three pillars of institutions framework – regulatory, normative, and cultural cognitive pillars. Methods: This was a qualitative study. Twenty-four in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with industry, government, civil society, and academic actors who are involved in nutrition policy in Australia. Results: The regulatory pillar was perceived to inhibit policy change through the co-regulation and self-regulation frameworks that assign rulemaking, monitoring and enforcement to industry bodies with minimal oversight by regulatory agencies and no involvement of health actors. The normative pillar was perceived to provide pathways for comprehensive statutory regulation through institutional goals and norms for collaboration that centre on a whole-of-government approach. The framing of food marketing policies to highlight the vulnerability of children is a cultural cognitive element that was perceived to be essential for getting support for policy change; however, there was a lack of shared understanding of food marketing as a policy issue. In addition, government ideologies that are perceived to be reluctant to regulate commercial actors and values that prioritize economic interest over public health make it difficult for health advocates to argue for statutory regulation of food marketing. Conclusion: Elements of all three pillars (regulatory, normative, and cultural-cognitive) were identified as either inhibitors or pathways that support policy change. This study contributes to the understanding of factors that inhibit policy change and potential pathways for implementing comprehensive statutory regulation of unhealthy food marketing.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7405
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management
Issue number1
Early online date13 Mar 2024
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Mar 2024

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • Australia
  • Food Advertsing Regulation
  • food marketing policy


Dive into the research topics of 'Inhibitors and supporters of policy change in the regulation of unhealthy food marketing in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this