Injunctions and monetary remedies compared: The English judicial response to the IP Enforcement Directive

Jane Cornwell

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article reviews and compares English case law developments on injunctions (including intermediary injunctions) and monetary remedies under the IP Enforcement Directive. Highlighting the divergent judicial response to the IPED across these different remedies, it argues that the cases on monetary remedies suggest particular concern about the disruptive impact of this aspect of the IPED on the wider private law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)490-500
JournalEuropean Intellectual Property Review
Volume40
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jul 2018

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • counterfeits
  • enforcement
  • EU law
  • implementation
  • infringement
  • injuctions
  • intellectual property
  • intermediaries
  • remedies

Access to Document

  • CornwellEIPR2018InjuctionsAndMonetaryRemediesCompared

    This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in European Intellectual Property Review following peer review. The definitive published version: Injunctions and monetary remedies compared: the English judicial response to the IP Enforcement Directive, Jane Cornwell, EIPR 2018, 40:*, 490-500 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service .

    Accepted author manuscript, 256 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution Non-Commercial (CC-BY-NC)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Injunctions and monetary remedies compared: The English judicial response to the IP Enforcement Directive'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
    View full fingerprint

    Cite this