Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Interest groups and effective substantive representation

  • Patrick Bernhagen*
  • , Joost Berkhout
  • , Adam Chalmers
  • , Beth L. Leech
  • , Amy Melissa McKay
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

While interest groups are often portrayed as vehicles of political representation, skeptical voices highlight the political inequalities and representational biases in the interest group system. In recent years, a considerable body of research has assessed the representative strengths and drawbacks of interest groups empirically. However, to date we lack a coherent theoretical perspective on the role played by interest groups in political representation that accommodates the conflicting views and findings. Assuming that moving forward theoretically requires adequate concepts, we propose a perspective on interest groups as vehicles of substantive representation that is reflected in public policy. Focusing on the level of the interest group system, we develop the concept of effective substantive representation against a backdrop of normative accounts of democratic representation as well as positive theoretical and empirical research on interest group politics. We apply the concept theoretically to two main mechanisms of interest representation—information provision and agenda setting. Finally, we illustrate the concept’s analytical value in the context of two intervening factors—group type and system of interest representation.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages20
JournalInterest Groups and Advocacy
Early online date12 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Feb 2026

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • agenda representation
  • discursive representation
  • effective substantive representation
  • interest groups
  • representation
  • representative claim

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interest groups and effective substantive representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this