Projects per year
Abstract
This chapter examines the role that international law played in the Scottish independence
debates. I argue that international law - perhaps surprisingly - played a central role.
International law was used by both ‘yes’ and ‘no’ campaigns in strategically instrumental
ways, to bolster their political claims as to the consequences of independence. The unusual
centrality of international law to British constitutional debate signals just how important
international law has become with respect to processes of political settlement globally. I
suggest that the creation of an international law of polity formation is itself a fast-moving
international legal development, illustrating a dynamic whereby the attempt to regulate polity
formation by reference to international legal argument carries an extraordinary capacity to reshape
international law. I suggest that this was the case with the Scottish independence
referendum.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Scottish Independence Referendum |
Subtitle of host publication | Constitutional and Political Implications |
Editors | Aileen McHarg, Tom Mullen, Alan Page, Neil Walker |
Place of Publication | Oxford |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Number of pages | 26 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780198755524 |
Publication status | Published - 23 Jun 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'International Law, the Scottish Independence Debate and Political Settlement in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Transforming Political Settlements Towards Open and Inclusive Settlements
Bell, C. (Principal Investigator)
UK central government bodies/local authorities, health and hospital authorities
1/03/15 → 28/02/19
Project: Research