Projects per year
This chapter examines the role that international law played in the Scottish independence debates. I argue that international law - perhaps surprisingly - played a central role. International law was used by both ‘yes’ and ‘no’ campaigns in strategically instrumental ways, to bolster their political claims as to the consequences of independence. The unusual centrality of international law to British constitutional debate signals just how important international law has become with respect to processes of political settlement globally. I suggest that the creation of an international law of polity formation is itself a fast-moving international legal development, illustrating a dynamic whereby the attempt to regulate polity formation by reference to international legal argument carries an extraordinary capacity to reshape international law. I suggest that this was the case with the Scottish independence referendum.
|Title of host publication||The Scottish Independence Referendum|
|Subtitle of host publication||Constitutional and Political Implications|
|Editors||Aileen McHarg, Tom Mullen, Alan Page, Neil Walker|
|Place of Publication||Oxford|
|Publisher||Oxford University Press|
|Number of pages||26|
|Publication status||Published - 23 Jun 2016|
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'International Law, the Scottish Independence Debate and Political Settlement in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Finished