TY - JOUR
T1 - International organizations and the performativity of measuring states
T2 - Discipline through diagnosis
AU - Van Den Meerssche, Dimitri
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - This article explores how the World Bank's engagement with governance reform has sparked a practice of measuring, ranking and diagnosing countries based on an epistemically constructed ideal-type of the modern state. With Foucault, I define this praxis of normalisation as a 'transnational discipline of diagnosis'. The contribution of the article is both empirical and doctrinal. On an empirical level, it weaves together an innovative assemblage of three different technologies in the Bank's epistemic governance praxis: the axiomatic dimension (World Development Reports); the statistical dimension (Worldwide Governance Indicators) and the diagnostic dimension (Systematic Country Diagnostics). On a doctrinal level, drawing on critical sociology and performativity theory, the article categorises this epistemic praxis as a world-making socio-political enterprise. It thereby rejects both the categorisation of epistemic power as a mode of public authority (to be integrated in a public law framework), as well as the respresentationalist idioms that inform ideology critique.
AB - This article explores how the World Bank's engagement with governance reform has sparked a practice of measuring, ranking and diagnosing countries based on an epistemically constructed ideal-type of the modern state. With Foucault, I define this praxis of normalisation as a 'transnational discipline of diagnosis'. The contribution of the article is both empirical and doctrinal. On an empirical level, it weaves together an innovative assemblage of three different technologies in the Bank's epistemic governance praxis: the axiomatic dimension (World Development Reports); the statistical dimension (Worldwide Governance Indicators) and the diagnostic dimension (Systematic Country Diagnostics). On a doctrinal level, drawing on critical sociology and performativity theory, the article categorises this epistemic praxis as a world-making socio-political enterprise. It thereby rejects both the categorisation of epistemic power as a mode of public authority (to be integrated in a public law framework), as well as the respresentationalist idioms that inform ideology critique.
KW - governance
KW - indicators
KW - international organisations
KW - performativity
KW - socio-legal methodology
KW - transnational authority
KW - World Bank
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047479956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/15723747-01501006
DO - 10.1163/15723747-01501006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85047479956
SN - 1572-3739
VL - 15
SP - 168
EP - 201
JO - International Organizations Law Review
JF - International Organizations Law Review
IS - 1
ER -