International Variation in Surgical Practices in Units Performing Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Unit Survey from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).

Bundred JR, Sivesh Kathir Kamarajah, K Siaw-Acheampong, Dmitri Nepogodiev, Beth Jefferies, P Singh, Richard Malpass-Evans, Ewen A Griffiths, D Alderson, J.A. Gossage, Sean Mckay, I Mohamed, R van Hillegersberg, R Vohra, K Wanigsooriya, T Whitehouse, A Bagajevas, Abate Bekele, R Blanco-Colino, A Da RoitJ El Kafsi-Mawley, A Gjata, Ines Gockel, R G Castro, T Harustiak, P K Hsu, A Isik, A Kechagias, A Kennedy, B Kidane, H A Mahendran, L Mejia, J I Moreno, Ionut Negoi, A J Santiago, R Sayyed, Petra Schneider, S P Soares, M. Sousa, F R Takeda, S Vanstraten, B Wallner, Bas P.l. Wijnhoven, M Achiam, T Agustin, A Akbar, A.Z. Al-Bahrani, W. Al-Khyatt, M Albertsmeier, E Alghunaim , B Alkhaffaf, W Allum, F Am, N Andreollo, A Arndt, R Babor, J Barbosa, Raul Bardini bressan, D Beardsmore , G Beban, A Bernardes, Richard Berrisford, A Bianchi, M Bjelovic , A. Boddy, C Bolca, L Bonavina, Gavin Bryce, R Byrom, R Casaca, Dennis Chan, A. Charalabopoulos, Eun Sun Cheong, F Ciotola, E Colak, C Collins, S Constantinoiu , Rodolfo Costa, M Dahlke, G. Darling, K Dawas, G de Manzoni, A Denewer, M Devadas, S Dexter, S Dikinis , T Dimitrios, J Dolan, C Doung, J H Egberts, Y Elgharably, M Elhadi, S Elmahi, F A Farias, E Fekaj, J Fernandez, M Forshaw, Juliana Freire, D French, G Gacevski , J Gaedcke, S Gananadha , M M Gijon, Jay Gokhale, A Gordon, P Grimminger , R Guevara , A Guner, S Gutknecht , H Mahmoodzadeh, I Halldestam , J Hedberg, J Heisterkamp , S Higgs, M Hii, Andrew Hindmarsh, J Hoppner, A Isaza, Jakob R. Izbicki, R Jacobs, Pooja Jain, Jeanette Johansson, B Johnston, J Kafsi, Semagn Kassa, C Kelty, I. Khan, D Khoo, S Khyatt, D Kjaer , D Korkolis, Nicole Kreuser, M. Larsen, P Lau, J Leite, W Lewis, T Liakakos, C Loureiro , A Mahendran , Nicholas David Maynard, Richard McGregor, Stephen McNally, H Medina-Franco , R Meguid, R Melhado , Stewart Mercer, M Migliore , F Mingol, S Mogoanta, Y Mohri, S Monig, J. Moreno, N Motas, T Murphy, S Naqi, R Ni, S. Niazi, S Oglesby , K Okonta , S R Ortiz, Pal K, Fausto Palazzo, A Pascher, M Pascual, G Pata, M Pera, Susana Puig, J Ramirez, Dimitri A. Raptis, J Rasanen, D Reim, J Reynolds, W Robb, K. Robertson, G Rosero, C Rosman, J Rossaak, J Saarnio , A Santiago, M Schiesser , R R Scurtu, D Sekhniaidze, B Sevinc, Richard Skipworth, J So, M S Trugeda, A Syed, A M L Takahashi , F Takeda, M Talbot, M Tareen, Mikiko Terashima, M Testini, Nilanjana Tewari, M Tez, M. Thomas, M Tirnaksiz , V Tonini, C C Tu, P Turner, T Underwood, A Uzair, M Vallve-Bernal, Michele Valmasoni, C Vicente, J F Videira, Y Viswanath, J Weindelmayer, R White, D Wigle, Paul M Wilkerson, V Wills, E Zacharakis, Marcela Zuluaga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background Anastomotic leaks are associated with significant risk of morbidity, mortality and treatment costs after esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate international variation in unit-level clinical practice and resource availability for the prevention and management of anastomotic leak following esophagectomy. Method The Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) is an international research collaboration focussed on improving the care and outcomes of patients undergoing esophagectomy. Any unit performing esophagectomy worldwide can register to participate in OGAA studies. An online unit survey was developed and disseminated to lead surgeons at each unit registered to participate in OGAA. High (HIC) and Low/Middle (LMIC) Income countries were defined according to the World Bank whilst unit volume were defined as <20 vs 20-59 vs ≥60 cases/year in the unit. Results Responses were received from 141 units, a 77% (141/182) response rate. Median annual esophagectomy caseload was reported to be 26 (interquartile range 12-50). Only 48% (68/141) and 22% (31/141) of units had an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program and ERAS nurse respectively. HIC units had significantly higher rates of stapled anastomosis compared to LMIC units (66% vs 31%, p=0.005). Routine post-operative contrast-swallow anastomotic assessment was performed in 52% (73/141) units. Stent placement and interventional radiology drainage for anastomotic leak management were more commonly available in HICs than LMICs (99% vs 59%, p<0.001 and 99% vs 83%, p<0.001). Conclusions This international survey highlighted variation in surgical technique and management of anastomotic leak based on case volume and country income level. Further research is needed to understand the impact of this variation on patient outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Early online date22 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Variation in Surgical Practices in Units Performing Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Unit Survey from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this