Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time

Josiah P. J. King, Jia E. Loy, Hannah Rohde, Martin Corley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

When questioning the veracity of an utterance, we perceive certain non-linguistic behaviours to indicate that a speaker is being deceptive. Recent work has highlighted that listeners’ associations between speech disfluency and dishonesty are detectable at the earliest stages of reference comprehension, suggesting that the manner of spoken delivery influences pragmatic judgements concurrently with the processing of lexical information. Here, we investigate the integration of a speaker’s gestures into judgements of deception, and ask if and when associations between nonverbal cues and deception emerge. Participants saw and heard a video of a potentially dishonest speaker describe treasure hidden behind an object, while also viewing images of both the named object and a distractor object. Their task was to click on the object behind which they believed the treasure to actually be hidden. Eye and mouse movements were recorded. Experiment 1 investigated listeners’ associations between visual cues and deception, using a variety of static and dynamic cues. Experiment 2 focused on adaptor gestures. We show that a speaker’s nonverbal behaviour can have a rapid and direct influence on listeners’ pragmatic judgements, supporting the idea that communication is fundamentally multimodal.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0229486
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Mar 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this