Intragenic enhancers act as alternative promoters

Monika S Kowalczyk, Jim R Hughes, David Garrick, Magnus D Lynch, Jacqueline A Sharpe, Jacqueline A Sloane-Stanley, Simon J McGowan, Marco De Gobbi, Mona Hosseini, Douglas Vernimmen, Jill M Brown, Nicola E Gray, Licio Collavin, Richard J Gibbons, Jonathan Flint, Stephen Taylor, Veronica J Buckle, Thomas A Milne, William G Wood, Douglas R Higgs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A substantial amount of organismal complexity is thought to be encoded by enhancers which specify the location, timing, and levels of gene expression. In mammals there are more enhancers than promoters which are distributed both between and within genes. Here we show that activated, intragenic enhancers frequently act as alternative tissue-specific promoters producing a class of abundant, spliced, multiexonic poly(A)(+) RNAs (meRNAs) which reflect the host gene's structure. meRNAs make a substantial and unanticipated contribution to the complexity of the transcriptome, appearing as alternative isoforms of the host gene. The low protein-coding potential of meRNAs suggests that many meRNAs may be byproducts of enhancer activation or underlie as-yet-unidentified RNA-encoded functions. Distinguishing between meRNAs and mRNAs will transform our interpretation of dynamic changes in transcription both at the level of individual genes and of the genome as a whole.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)447-58
Number of pages12
JournalMolecular Cell
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Intragenic enhancers act as alternative promoters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this