Introduction

Daniel Kenealy; Jan Eichhorn; Richard Parry; Lindsay Paterson; Alexandra Remond

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_1

Introduction

Daniel Kenealy, Jan Eichhorn, Richard Parry, Lindsay Paterson, Alexandra Remond

School of Social and Political Science

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract / Description of output

This chapter places our research into public and elite attitudes to constitutional change in the UK in historical context. It considers the situation on 19 September 2014, the day after Scotland voted to remain in the UK. In the months that followed, significant developments occurred in the governance of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. We consider those developments and also set out the approach we adopted to our research and the structure of this book.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK
Subtitle of host publication	A Missed Opportunity?
Editors	Daniel Kenealy, Jan Eichhorn, Richard Parry, Lindsay Paterson, Alexandra Remond
Publisher	Palgrave Macmillan
Chapter	1
Pages	1-19
Edition	1
ISBN (Electronic)	9783319528182
ISBN (Print)	9783319-528175
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_1
Publication status	Published - 2017

Publication series

Name	Comparative Territorial Politics
Publisher	Palgrave Macmillan UK

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

UK politics
Scottish independence
constitution
political participation
engagement
democracy

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_1

6 Chapter
1 Book

Conclusion
Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L. & Remond, A., 2017, Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK: A Missed Opportunity?. Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L. & Remond, A. (eds.). 1 ed. Palgrave Macmillan, p. 149-159 (Comparative Territorial Politics).
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
Political Engagement
Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L. & Remond, A., 2017, Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK: A Missed Opportunity?. Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L. & Remond, A. (eds.). 1 ed. Palgrave Macmillan, p. 21-44 (Comparative Territorial Politics).
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK: A Missed Opportunity?
Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L. & Remond, A., 2017, 1 ed. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 177 p. (Comparative Territorial Politics)
Research output: Book/Report › Book

Cite this

@inbook{b0d3c08b196144e59ca92b7972362521,

title = "Introduction",

abstract = "This chapter places our research into public and elite attitudes to constitutional change in the UK in historical context. It considers the situation on 19 September 2014, the day after Scotland voted to remain in the UK. In the months that followed, significant developments occurred in the governance of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. We consider those developments and also set out the approach we adopted to our research and the structure of this book.",

keywords = "UK politics, Scottish independence, constitution, political participation, engagement, democracy",

author = "Daniel Kenealy and Jan Eichhorn and Richard Parry and Lindsay Paterson and Alexandra Remond",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_1",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783319-528175",

series = "Comparative Territorial Politics",

publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

pages = "1--19",

editor = "Daniel Kenealy and Jan Eichhorn and Richard Parry and Lindsay Paterson and Alexandra Remond",

booktitle = "Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK",

edition = "1",

}

Introduction. / Kenealy, Daniel ; Eichhorn, Jan ; Parry, Richard et al.
Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK: A Missed Opportunity?. ed. / Daniel Kenealy; Jan Eichhorn; Richard Parry; Lindsay Paterson; Alexandra Remond. 1. ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. p. 1-19 (Comparative Territorial Politics).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Introduction

AU - Kenealy, Daniel

AU - Eichhorn, Jan

AU - Parry, Richard

AU - Paterson, Lindsay

AU - Remond, Alexandra

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This chapter places our research into public and elite attitudes to constitutional change in the UK in historical context. It considers the situation on 19 September 2014, the day after Scotland voted to remain in the UK. In the months that followed, significant developments occurred in the governance of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. We consider those developments and also set out the approach we adopted to our research and the structure of this book.

AB - This chapter places our research into public and elite attitudes to constitutional change in the UK in historical context. It considers the situation on 19 September 2014, the day after Scotland voted to remain in the UK. In the months that followed, significant developments occurred in the governance of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. We consider those developments and also set out the approach we adopted to our research and the structure of this book.

KW - UK politics

KW - Scottish independence

KW - constitution

KW - political participation

KW - engagement

KW - democracy

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_1

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_1

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319-528175

T3 - Comparative Territorial Politics

SP - 1

EP - 19

BT - Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK

A2 - Kenealy, Daniel

A2 - Eichhorn, Jan

A2 - Parry, Richard

A2 - Paterson, Lindsay

A2 - Remond, Alexandra

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -

Introduction

Abstract / Description of output

Publication series

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

Conclusion

Political Engagement

Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK: A Missed Opportunity?

Cite this