Inversion and finiteness in Spanish and English: Developmental evidence from the optional infinitive and optional inversion stages

John Grinstead*, Mariana Vega-Mendoza, Grant Goodall

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There is evidence to suggest that finiteness marking on verbs and subject-auxiliary inversion are related phenomena in English. In contrast, in Spanish there is evidence consistent with finiteness marking on verbs and the apparently similar phenomenon of subject-verb inversion being unrelated. In both cases, most of the evidence adduced comes from adult acceptability judgments and other adult psycholinguistic work. In the present article, we present evidence from child English and Spanish that supports the interrelatedness of finiteness and inversion in English, but not Spanish. Specifically, we show that child English speakers who are in the optional infinitive stage have variable judgments of finiteness that are predictive of their independently measured inversion judgments. In contrast, no such relationship appears to hold between the variance in finiteness and the variance in inversion judgments of child Spanish speakers of the same preschool age. We take this to be novel confirmation of the hypothesis that subject-auxiliary inversion in English takes finite tense as a necessary condition. In Spanish, in contrast, it appears that it is not necessary for a finite verb to move to the left periphery for subject-verb inversion.*.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)575-610
Number of pages36
JournalLanguage
Volume94
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2018

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • child English
  • child Spanish
  • finiteness
  • optional infinitive stage
  • optional inversion stage
  • subject-auxiliary inversion
  • syntax
  • V-to-I-to-C

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inversion and finiteness in Spanish and English: Developmental evidence from the optional infinitive and optional inversion stages'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this