TY - JOUR
T1 - Is forest regeneration good for biodiversity? Exploring the social dimensions of an apparently ecological debate
AU - Barnaud, Cécile
AU - Fischer, Anke
AU - Staddon, Sam
AU - Blackstock, Kirsty
AU - Moreau, Clémence
AU - Corbera, Esteve
AU - Hester, Alison
AU - Mathevet, Raphaël
AU - Mckee, Annie
AU - Reyes, Joana
AU - Sirami, Clélia
AU - Eastwood, Antonia
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - Forest regeneration is a major land-use change in European uplands, and whether or not this is a desirable change for biodiversity is disputed. While this debate seems to be largely situated in the field of natural sciences, this paper aims to also examine its social dimensions. To do so, we adopt a comparative discourse analysis with four cases of protected areas in France, Spain, and Scotland. We draw on a conceptual framework highlighting both the ecological and social factors underpinning the construction of environmental discourses. It notably emphasises the role of interests, ideas and institutions, and the power dynamics underpinning discourse-coalitions. We show how diverging discourses emerged, gained ground, coalesced and competed differently in different contexts, explaining the adoption of seemingly opposite discourses by protected area authorities. These findings reaffirm the need to conceive environmental governance as an on-going deliberative process in order to achieve environmental justice.
AB - Forest regeneration is a major land-use change in European uplands, and whether or not this is a desirable change for biodiversity is disputed. While this debate seems to be largely situated in the field of natural sciences, this paper aims to also examine its social dimensions. To do so, we adopt a comparative discourse analysis with four cases of protected areas in France, Spain, and Scotland. We draw on a conceptual framework highlighting both the ecological and social factors underpinning the construction of environmental discourses. It notably emphasises the role of interests, ideas and institutions, and the power dynamics underpinning discourse-coalitions. We show how diverging discourses emerged, gained ground, coalesced and competed differently in different contexts, explaining the adoption of seemingly opposite discourses by protected area authorities. These findings reaffirm the need to conceive environmental governance as an on-going deliberative process in order to achieve environmental justice.
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.012
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.012
M3 - Article
SN - 1462-9011
VL - 120
SP - 63
EP - 72
JO - Environmental Science & Policy
JF - Environmental Science & Policy
ER -