Is microscopic examination of hysterectomy specimens removed for clinically benign disease necessary?

T Andrews, Hannah Monaghan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The likelihood of finding significant pathology in a hysterectomy specimen undertaken for clinically benign disease is low. Some data indicate that microscopic examination of these specimens may be abandoned. While this approach may seem attractive, the authors believe that there are a number of practical and clinical governance issues associated with this. Instead a pragmatic approach is advocated, with two tissue blocks (cervix and endomyometrium) being adequate in most cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-6
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Clinical Pathology
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2008

Keywords

  • Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
  • Endometrial Neoplasms
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hysterectomy
  • Menorrhagia
  • Pathology, Surgical
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Unnecessary Procedures
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
  • Uterine Prolapse

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is microscopic examination of hysterectomy specimens removed for clinically benign disease necessary?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this