Islamism and the state after the Arab uprisings: Between people power and state power

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines the trajectories of different Islamist trends in the light of the Arab uprisings. It proposes a distinction between statist and non-statist Islamism to help understand the multiplicity of interactions between Islamists and the state, particularly after 2011. It is outlined how statist Islamists (Islamist parties principally) can contribute to the stabilization and democratization of the state when their interactions with other social and political actors facilitate consensus building in national politics. By contrast when these interactions are conflictual, it has a detrimental impact on both the statist Islamists, and the possibility of democratic politics at the national level. Non statist-Islamists (from quietist salafi to armed jihadi) who prioritize the religious community over national politics are directly impacted by the interactions between statist Islamists and the state, and generally tend to benefit from the failure to build a consensus over democratic national politics. Far more than nationally-grounded statist Islamists, non-statist Islamists shape and are shaped by the regional dynamics on the Arab uprisings and the international and transnational relations between the different countries and conflict areas of the Middle East. The Arab uprisings and their aftermath reshaped pre-existing national and international dynamics of confrontation and collaboration between Islamists and the state, and between statist and non-statists Islamists, for better (Tunisia) and for worse (Egypt).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)276-293
JournalDemocratization
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Mar 2015

Keywords

  • Islamism
  • state institutions
  • conflict
  • transnationalism
  • ideology
  • Arab uprisings

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Islamism and the state after the Arab uprisings: Between people power and state power'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this