Jacques Maritain's Definition of Art

Anthony Richard Haynes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

I examine Jacques Maritain's definition of art and what it contributes to debates on definitions of art in contemporary aesthetics. Of particular concern are the so-called ‘fine arts’. I make three claims; first, that Maritain's definition of art is superior to other traditional and contemporary theories in avoiding their pitfalls and accommodating key data to be met by definitions of art, such as the existence of avant-garde art. Second, I claim that in accommodating avant-garde art, in particular ‘conceptual art’, Maritain's definition of art refutes the Wittgensteinian argument that art is an ‘open concept’ which cannot be defined. My final, resulting claim is that Maritain's definition deserves to be the pre-eminent definition of art today. This article consists of four sections. Section one provides some context of definitions of art and the data and conditions that have to be met by a viable definition. Section two provides the foundation and first pillar of Maritain's definition of art, what I identify as a cumulative ‘descriptive’ definition. Section three provides the second pillar of Maritain's definition of art, applicable specifically to the fine arts. Section four applies Maritain's full descriptive definition to the problem of conceptual art.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)527-541
JournalNew Blackfriars
Volume96
Issue number1065
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Jacques Maritain's Definition of Art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this