Judicial review and transitional justice: Reflective judgement in three contexts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

This article seeks to examine the ways in which courts of constitutional review have tried to deal with public sentiments within societies emerging from large–scale oppression and conflict. A comparative analysis of judicial review decisions from post–communist Hungary, post–Apartheid South Africa and post–dictatorial Argentina is meant to show–case how judges have, more or less successfully, recognised and pedagogically engaged social negative feelings of resentment and indignation towards former victimisers and beneficiaries of violence. Thus, the article hopes to pave the way for more in–depth research on one of the most neglected dimensions of post–conflict societies: public affect.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-29
Number of pages29
JournalPapeles del CEIC
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • Transitional Justice, judicial review, public sentiment, Hungary, South Africa, Argentina


Dive into the research topics of 'Judicial review and transitional justice: Reflective judgement in three contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this