Abstract / Description of output
The jurisdiction of international courts and tribunals and the admissibility of inter-State claims under international law are central to international adjudication, operating as a gateway to the litigation on the merits – the end goal of the proceedings. Still, these concepts remain inherently under-defined, and can be shaped in multiple ways to formulate preliminary objections in international litigation in general. International investor-State arbitration adds specific aspects and complexities to the issue. This introductory contribution accounts for the theoretical deficiencies underpinning the notions of jurisdiction and admissibility with a special focus on international investment arbitration, and introduces the selected case-studies which form the subject of this Special Issue’s articles. The recent Urbaser award is also used as an example of the
unexplored potential of novel – and critical – legal argumentation relating to the jurisdiction of investment tribunals.
unexplored potential of novel – and critical – legal argumentation relating to the jurisdiction of investment tribunals.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3-20 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 21 Jun 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 21 Jun 2017 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- jurisdiction
- admissibility
- investment arbitration
- competence
- preliminary objections
- urbaser
- counterclaims