Projects per year
This paper has two central aims. First, we motivate a puzzle. The puzzle features four independently plausible but jointly inconsistent claims. One of the four claims is the sufficiency leg of the knowledge norm of assertion (KNA-S), according to which one is properly epistemically positioned to assert that p if one knows that p. Second, we propose that rejecting (KNA-S) is the best way out of the puzzle. Our argument to this end appeals to the epistemic value of intellectual humility in social-epistemic practice.
|Journal||Logos and Episteme|
|Early online date||31 Dec 2016|
|Publication status||Published - Dec 2016|
- social - epistemic practice
- epistemic value
- intellectual humility
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Knowledge, assertion and intellectual humility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Finished
Intellectual Humility Massive Open Online Course
1/07/15 → 31/03/18