TY - JOUR
T1 - Lagrangian displacement field estimators in cosmology
AU - Ota, Atsuhisa
AU - Seo, Hee Jong
AU - Saito, Shun
AU - Beutler, Florian
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Marcel Schmittfull for providing simulations and valuable discussions. A. O. is supported in part by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2021YFC2203100). A. O. and H.-J. S. are supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics under DE-SC0019091. S. S. acknowledges support for this work from NSF-2219212. S. S. is also supported by World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan. This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant Agreement No. 853291). F. B. is a University Research Fellow.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Physical Society.
PY - 2023/6/16
Y1 - 2023/6/16
N2 - The late-time nonlinear Lagrangian displacement field is highly correlated with the initial field, so reconstructing it could enable us to extract primordial cosmological information. Our previous work [A. Ota et al., Phys. Rev. D 104, 123508 (2021)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.104.123508] carefully studied the displacement field reconstructed from the late-time density field using the iterative method proposed by Schmittfull et al. [Phys. Rev. D 96, 023505 (2017)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.96.023505] and found that it does not fully converge to the true, underlying displacement field (e.g., ∼8% offset at k∼0.2 h Mpc-1 at z=0.6). We also constructed the Lagrangian perturbation theory model for the reconstructed field, but the model could not explain the discrepancy between the true and the reconstructed fields in the previous work. The main sources of the discrepancy were speculated to be a numerical artifact in the displacement estimator due to the discreteness of the sample. In this paper, we develop two new estimators of the displacement fields to reduce such a numerical discreteness effect, the normalized momentum estimator and the rescaled resumed estimator. We show that the discrepancy Ota et al. [Phys. Rev. D 104, 123508 (2021)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.104.123508] reported is not due to the numerical artifacts. We conclude that the method from Schmittfull et al. [Phys. Rev. D 96, 023505 (2017)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.96.023505] cannot fully reconstruct the shape of the nonlinear displacement field at the redshift we studied, while it is still an efficient baryon acoustic oscillation reconstruction method. In parallel, by properly accounting for the UV-sensitive term in a reconstruction procedure with an effective field theory approach, we improve the theoretical model for the reconstructed displacement field, by almost 5 times, from ∼15% to the level of a few percent at k∼0.2 h Mpc-1 at the redshift z=0.6.
AB - The late-time nonlinear Lagrangian displacement field is highly correlated with the initial field, so reconstructing it could enable us to extract primordial cosmological information. Our previous work [A. Ota et al., Phys. Rev. D 104, 123508 (2021)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.104.123508] carefully studied the displacement field reconstructed from the late-time density field using the iterative method proposed by Schmittfull et al. [Phys. Rev. D 96, 023505 (2017)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.96.023505] and found that it does not fully converge to the true, underlying displacement field (e.g., ∼8% offset at k∼0.2 h Mpc-1 at z=0.6). We also constructed the Lagrangian perturbation theory model for the reconstructed field, but the model could not explain the discrepancy between the true and the reconstructed fields in the previous work. The main sources of the discrepancy were speculated to be a numerical artifact in the displacement estimator due to the discreteness of the sample. In this paper, we develop two new estimators of the displacement fields to reduce such a numerical discreteness effect, the normalized momentum estimator and the rescaled resumed estimator. We show that the discrepancy Ota et al. [Phys. Rev. D 104, 123508 (2021)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.104.123508] reported is not due to the numerical artifacts. We conclude that the method from Schmittfull et al. [Phys. Rev. D 96, 023505 (2017)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.96.023505] cannot fully reconstruct the shape of the nonlinear displacement field at the redshift we studied, while it is still an efficient baryon acoustic oscillation reconstruction method. In parallel, by properly accounting for the UV-sensitive term in a reconstruction procedure with an effective field theory approach, we improve the theoretical model for the reconstructed displacement field, by almost 5 times, from ∼15% to the level of a few percent at k∼0.2 h Mpc-1 at the redshift z=0.6.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163786477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.123523
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.123523
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85163786477
SN - 2470-0010
VL - 107
SP - 1
EP - 16
JO - Physical Review D
JF - Physical Review D
IS - 12
M1 - 123523
ER -