Learning, information, and sorting in market entry games: theory and evidence

John Duffy, Ed Hopkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Previous data from experiments on market entry games, N-player games where each player faces a choice between entering a market and staying out, appear inconsistent with either mixed or pure Nash equilibria. Here we show that, in this class of game, learning theory predicts sorting, that is, in the long run, agents play a pure strategy equilibrium with some agents permanently in the market, and some permanently out. We conduct experiments with a larger number of repetitions than in previous work in order to test this prediction. We find that when subjects are given minimal information, only after close to 100 periods do subjects begin to approach equilibrium. In contrast, with full information, subjects learn to play a pure strategy equilibrium relatively quickly. However, the information which permits rapid convergence, revelation of the individual play of all opponents, is not predicted to have any effect by existing models of learning.

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-62
Number of pages32
JournalGames and Economic Behavior
Volume51
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Learning, information, and sorting in market entry games: theory and evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this