Legal Statements and Normative Language

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Can there be a non-reductivist, source-based explanation of the use of normative language in statements describing the law and legal situations? This problem was formulated by Joseph Raz, who also claimed to have solved it. According to his well-known doctrine of ‘detached’ statements, normative legal statements can be informatively made by speakers who merely adopt, without necessarily sharing, the point of view of someone who accepts that legal norms are justified and ought to be followed. In this paper I defend two theses. I argue, first, that the notion of a detached statement cannot be made to work, and that Raz’s problem is thus not thereby solved. But the problem itself, I also suggest, is a false one.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-199
Number of pages33
JournalLaw and Philosophy
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Legal Statements and Normative Language'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this