Liberal or restrictive transfusion after cardiac surgery

Gavin J Murphy, Katie Pike, Chris A Rogers, Sarah Wordsworth, Elizabeth A Stokes, Gianni D Angelini, Barnaby C Reeves, TITRe2 Investigators, Gordon Murray (Member of Consortium)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether a restrictive threshold for hemoglobin level in red-cell transfusions, as compared with a liberal threshold, reduces postoperative morbidity and health care costs after cardiac surgery is uncertain.

METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, parallel-group trial in which patients older than 16 years of age who were undergoing nonemergency cardiac surgery were recruited from 17 centers in the United Kingdom. Patients with a postoperative hemoglobin level of less than 9 g per deciliter were randomly assigned to a restrictive transfusion threshold (hemoglobin level <7.5 g per deciliter) or a liberal transfusion threshold (hemoglobin level <9 g per deciliter). The primary outcome was a serious infection (sepsis or wound infection) or an ischemic event (permanent stroke [confirmation on brain imaging and deficit in motor, sensory, or coordination functions], myocardial infarction, infarction of the gut, or acute kidney injury) within 3 months after randomization. Health care costs, excluding the index surgery, were estimated from the day of surgery to 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS: A total of 2007 patients underwent randomization; 4 participants withdrew, leaving 1000 in the restrictive-threshold group and 1003 in the liberal-threshold group. Transfusion rates after randomization were 53.4% and 92.2% in the two groups, respectively. The primary outcome occurred in 35.1% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group and 33.0% of the patients in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.34; P=0.30); there was no indication of heterogeneity according to subgroup. There were more deaths in the restrictive-threshold group than in the liberal-threshold group (4.2% vs. 2.6%; hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.67; P=0.045). Serious postoperative complications, excluding primary-outcome events, occurred in 35.7% of participants in the restrictive-threshold group and 34.2% of participants in the liberal-threshold group. Total costs did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS: A restrictive transfusion threshold after cardiac surgery was not superior to a liberal threshold with respect to morbidity or health care costs. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment program; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN70923932.).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)997-1008
Number of pages12
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume372
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Mar 2015

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Blood Transfusion
  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs
  • Hemoglobins
  • Humans
  • Ischemia
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Sepsis
  • Surgical Wound Infection

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Liberal or restrictive transfusion after cardiac surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this