Looking for Trouble: Medical Science and Clinical Practice in the Historiography of Modern Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The relationship between the pursuit of science and the practice of medicine has been a theme of abiding interest among medical historians. For the past 30 years or so, historians have characterised that relationship largely in terms of divergence, tension and conflict. My contention is that that tension has been over-stated. In this paper, I show how the narrative of conflict came to dominate historians’ accounts of science–medicine relations, and suggest some reasons why that narrative, rather than a more mutualistic understanding of science and medicine, enjoys such credibility among historians of medicine.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)739-757
Number of pages19
JournalSocial History of Medicine
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • medical science
  • medical practice
  • historiography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Looking for Trouble: Medical Science and Clinical Practice in the Historiography of Modern Medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this