Low oxygen exposure does not cause pulmonary injury in the newborn rat

A. White*, J. R. McColm, J. Wade, Z. Yaqoob, K. Sedowofia, B. Fleck, N. McIntosh, A. Hislop, S. Cunningham

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Two recent studies have suggested that low levels of supplemental inspired oxygen may cause lung injury in preterm infants. Aims: To assess lung injury of newborn rats exposed to 14 days of low-level variation of oxygen. Study design: Four groups were compared with 12 animals per group and 4 lung sections per animal. These were, a control group raised in room air and three groups raised in levels of inspired oxygen fluctuating around the following mean values: group Lo (mean FiO2 0.179), group N (mean FiO2 0.213), and group Hi (mean FiO2 0.247). The degree of oxygen variability was identical for each group. Lungs were inflated at 20 cm H2O, fixed and stained with H and E and Millers Elastin. Subjects: Sprague Dawley albino newborn rats. Outcome measures: Random alveolar areas were studied and analysed using imaging software to assess total amount of tissue and elastin, number of secondary septa, and mean linear intercept. Results: There were no significant differences between the three experimental oxygen groups and the control group in terms of lung / body weight ratio and the measured markers of lung development. Conclusion: We conclude that low-level oxygen supplementation during early lung development does not affect alveolar development in the newborn rat.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-340
Number of pages6
JournalEarly Human Development
Volume82
Issue number5
Early online date15 Dec 2005
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2006

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • Alveolarisation
  • BPD
  • Development
  • Lung
  • Oxygen
  • Preterm

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low oxygen exposure does not cause pulmonary injury in the newborn rat'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this