MacDonald v Nicholson: A Case of Contractual Confusion

Martin Hogg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This article considers the recent case of MacDonald v Nicholson, critiquing those portions of the judgment relating to the uncertainty of the contract price, the nature and extent of the breach, and the characterisation of 'restitutio in integrum' suggested by one of the parties.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-259
Number of pages5
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'MacDonald v Nicholson: A Case of Contractual Confusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this