Making borders, closing frontiers and identifying smuggling: Comparative histories

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter deals with smuggling as a historical phenomenon. It begins by addressing the relationship between the definition, demarcation and enforcement of international borders in distinct types of terrain, on the one hand, and the incidence and modes of smuggling on the other. The chapter then turns to a more detailed comparison of instances drawn from across Europe, Africa, South East Asia and North America. These exemplify three different patterns. The first is where smuggling was a response to colonial revenue imperatives, for which colonial West Africa provides clear examples. The second is where the intention was to restrict the flow of commodities, substances and people deemed dangerous. Here the examples are drawn from colonial West Africa (religious tracts and firearms), South East Asia (firearms and narcotics) and the US–Canada border (people and alcohol). The third pattern is where a border suddenly emerged during a moment of political rupture. Here, the primary focus is on the appearance of the border between Northern Ireland and the Irish Free State in 1922. The general lesson is that while smuggling was a response to state practices, the borderlands as lived spaces were themselves shaped by the ideas and daily strategies surrounding smuggling.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of Smuggling
EditorsMax Gallien, Florian Weigand
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter7
Pages95-106
Number of pages12
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781003043645
ISBN (Print)9780367489533
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Dec 2021

Publication series

NameRoutledge International Handbooks
PublisherRoutledge

Keywords

  • smuggling
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • North America
  • borders
  • bordering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making borders, closing frontiers and identifying smuggling: Comparative histories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this