Making Research Matter Comment on "Public Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal"

David J Hunter, John Frank

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

We offer a UK-based commentary on the recent "Perspective" published in IJHPM by Thakkar and Sullivan. We are sympathetic to the authors' call for increased funding for health service and policy research (HSPR). However, we point out that increasing that investment - in any of the three countries they compare: Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom- will ipso facto not necessarily lead to any better use of research by health system decision-makers in these settings. We cite previous authors' descriptions of the many factors that tend to make the worlds of researchers and decision-makers into "two solitudes." And we call for changes in the structure and funding of HSPR, particularly the incentives now in place for purely academic publishing, to tackle a widespread reality: most published research in HSPR, as in other applied fields of science, is never read or used by the vast majority of decision-makers, working out in the "real world.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-355
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Aug 2017

Keywords

  • Health Service and Policy Research (HSPR), Evidence, Health Reform

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making Research Matter Comment on "Public Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this