Mammographic surveillance in women younger than 50 years who have a family history of breast cancer: tumour characteristics and projected effect on mortality in the prospective, single-arm, FH01 study

FH01 Collaborative Teams, Stephen W. Duffy, James Mackay, Sue Thomas, Elaine Anderson, D. Gareth Evans, Hilary Fielder, Rosemary Fox, Jonathon Gray, Gerald Gui, Douglas Macmillan, Sue Moss, Cerilan Rogers, Richard Sainsbury, Mark Sibbering, Caroline Boggis, John Burn, Jack Cuzick, Bob Haward, Anthony HowellRobert Mansel, Hazel Marshall Cork, John Robertson, Julietta Patnick, Paul Pharoah, Anne Robinson, Stephen Sutton, Masako Kataoka, Penelope Moyle, Matthew Wallis, Ruth Warren, Ellis Louise Jones, Joan Austoker, Alison Clements, Eila Watson, Ken Young, Prue Allgood, Phil Duffy, Rhian Gabe, Lorraine Roberts, Iqbal Warsi, Jack Caunt, Adam Brentnall, Fiona Dungey, Attila Lorincz, Judith Offman, Marion Adams, Jenny Affen, Mary Aldous, Alison Allen, Michael Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Background Evidence supports a reduction in mortality from breast cancer with mammographic screening in the general population of women aged 40-49 years but the effect of family history is not clear We aimed to establish whether screening affects the disease stage and projected mortality of women younger than 50 years who have a clinically significant family history of breast cancer

Methods In the single arm FH01 study, women at intermediate familial risk who were younger than 50 years were enrolled from 76 centres in the UK and received yearly mammography Women with BRCA mutations were not explicitly excluded but would be rare in this group To compare the FH01 cohort with women not receiving screening two external comparison groups were used the control group of the UK Age Trial (106971 women aged 40-42 years at recruitment from the general population [ie average risk] followed up for 10 years), and a Dutch study of women with a family history of breast cancer (cancer cases aged 25-77 years diagnosed 1980-2004) Study endpoints were size, node status and histological grade of invasive tumours and estimated mortality calculated from the Nottingham prognostic index (NPI) score, and adjusted for differences in underlying risk between the FH01 cohort and the control group of the UK Age Trial This study is registered with the National Research Register number N0484114809

Findings 6710 women were enrolled between Jan 16 2003 and Feb 28,2007, and received yearly mammography for a mean of 4 years (SD 2) up until Nov 30,2009 surveillance and reporting of cancers is still underway 136 women were diagnosed with breast cancer 105 (77%) at screening 28 (21%) symptomatically in the interval between screening events and three (2%) symptomatically after failing to attend their latest mammogram Invasive tumours in the FH01 study were significantly smaller (p=0 0094) less likely to be node positive (p=0 0083) and of more favourable grade (p=0 0072) than were those in the control group of the UK Age Trial and were significantly less likely to be node positive than were tumours in the Dutch study (p=0 012) Mean NPI score was significantly lower in the FH01 cohort than in the control group of the UK Age Trial (p=0 00079) or the Dutch study (p<0 0001) After adjustment for underlying risk predicted 10 year mortality was significantly lower in the FH01 cohort (1 10%) than in the control group of the UK Age Trial (1 38%) with relative risk of 0 80 (95% CI 0 66-0 96 p=0 022)

Interpretation Yearly mammography in women with a medium familial risk of breast cancer is likely to be effective in prevention of deaths from breast cancer

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1127-1134
Number of pages8
JournalThe Lancet Oncology
Volume11
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mammographic surveillance in women younger than 50 years who have a family history of breast cancer: tumour characteristics and projected effect on mortality in the prospective, single-arm, FH01 study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this