Abstract
Purpose
– Against a backdrop of legislative and policy changes, this paper assesses the extent to which the over-65 age-group is moving from the margins to the mainstream of UK employment. The purpose of this paper is to fill a gap in HR research and practice which, it is argued, has paid relatively little attention to the over-65s.
Design/methodology/approach
– The analysis draws on three waves of the Labour Force Survey (LFS) (2001, 2008, 2014), to explore the extent to which organisational, occupational and sectoral marginalisation of the over-65s has changed in the twenty-first century.
Findings
– The results show that the share of 65-69 year olds working as employees doubled between 2001 and 2014, primarily because long-term established employees worked longer. Overrepresentations of lower-level “Lopaq” occupations reduced, and over-65s became more integrated across occupations and sectors.
Research limitations/implications
– More research is needed to understand the factors driving the steady move from the margins to the mainstream (e.g. LFS does not measure pensions), and future research on the older workforce should automatically include workers in this age-group.
Practical implications
– The discussion considers the implications for managerial practice, in a context of increasingly age-diverse workforces.
Originality/value
– This paper addresses a gap in research into later life working and also demonstrates the ways in which the nature of employment among the over-65s is changing, thereby challenging some of the assumptions about those who work into later life and how they are – or should be managed.
– Against a backdrop of legislative and policy changes, this paper assesses the extent to which the over-65 age-group is moving from the margins to the mainstream of UK employment. The purpose of this paper is to fill a gap in HR research and practice which, it is argued, has paid relatively little attention to the over-65s.
Design/methodology/approach
– The analysis draws on three waves of the Labour Force Survey (LFS) (2001, 2008, 2014), to explore the extent to which organisational, occupational and sectoral marginalisation of the over-65s has changed in the twenty-first century.
Findings
– The results show that the share of 65-69 year olds working as employees doubled between 2001 and 2014, primarily because long-term established employees worked longer. Overrepresentations of lower-level “Lopaq” occupations reduced, and over-65s became more integrated across occupations and sectors.
Research limitations/implications
– More research is needed to understand the factors driving the steady move from the margins to the mainstream (e.g. LFS does not measure pensions), and future research on the older workforce should automatically include workers in this age-group.
Practical implications
– The discussion considers the implications for managerial practice, in a context of increasingly age-diverse workforces.
Originality/value
– This paper addresses a gap in research into later life working and also demonstrates the ways in which the nature of employment among the over-65s is changing, thereby challenging some of the assumptions about those who work into later life and how they are – or should be managed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 646 - 664 |
Journal | Employee Relations |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 25 Jun 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- older workers
- marginalization
- age-diversity
- working past 65
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Managing employees beyond age 65: From the margins to the mainstream?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
-
Response to call to create one million more jobs for older workers by 2022
6/06/18
1 Media contribution
Press/Media: Research
Profiles
-
Wendy Loretto
- Business School - Personal Chair of Organisational Behaviour
- Organisation Studies
- Centre for Service Excellence
- Culture, Accounting & Society Research Network
- Leadership, Organisations and Society
Person: Academic: Research Active