TY - JOUR
T1 - Mapping commercial practices of the pesticide industry to shape science and policymaking: a scoping review
AU - Schölin, Lisa
AU - Petticrew, Mark
AU - Collin, Jeff
AU - Knipe, Duleeka
AU - Barry, Rachel
AU - Eddleston, Michael
AU - Gunnell, David
AU - Pearson, Melissa
AU - van Schalkwyk, May C I
N1 - L.S. receives salary support from the Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention (CPSP), which is funded by a grant from Open Philanthropy, at the recommendation of GiveWell, and has grant funding from the Carnegie Trust. L.S. has previously had grant funding from the Institute for Alcohol Studies. M.Pea. has received funding from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP) on a Young Investigator grant (2018) and salary support on an Investigator Grant, and the Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention (CPSP) has provided salary support. D.K. has received funding from AFSP and CPSP for research related to suicide and self-harm. M.v.S. was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Doctoral Fellowship (NIHR3000156) and her research was also partially supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North Thames. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. M.v.S., M.P., and J.C. have funding through and are co-investigators, respectively, in the SPECTRUM consortium, which is funded by the UK Prevention Research Partnership (UKPRP), a consortium of UK funders [UKRI Research Councils: Medical Research Council (MRC), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Natural Environment Research Council (NERC); Charities: British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Wellcome and The Health Foundation; Government: Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office, Health and Care Research Wales, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) and Public Health Agency (NI)]. M.P. has grant funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) ‘Three Schools’ Mental Health Programme.
PY - 2025/2/1
Y1 - 2025/2/1
N2 - There is a growing body of evidence for how health harming industries (HHIs) engage in similar practices to influence science and policymaking. However, limited attention has been paid to the pesticide industry within the commercial determinants of health (CDOH) field. We conducted a scoping review to map practices adopted by the pesticide industry to influence science and policymaking and to assess the breadth and focus of the associated literature. We included 31 documents and categorized the extracted data using a typology of commercial practices. The documents described how major pesticide companies, and their trade bodies, have acted to influence science and maintain favourable regulatory environments while undermining the credibility of researchers and agencies that publish findings threatening to their commercial interests. A large proportion of the literature consists of historical analyses, narrative reviews, commentaries/perspective pieces, and investigative reports published in the grey literature, predominantly informed by analysis of internal industry documents and freedom of information requests. Most studies focus on high-income settings. There were a limited number of primary peer-reviewed empirical studies that explicitly aimed to study the practices of the pesticide industry from a CDOH perspective. However, our findings show that major pesticide companies adopt political and scientific practices highly similar to other HHIs. The review shows a critical need for research on the pesticide industry’s current practices in low- and middle-income countries where the negative impacts of its activities on health and the environment are likely to be more marked.
AB - There is a growing body of evidence for how health harming industries (HHIs) engage in similar practices to influence science and policymaking. However, limited attention has been paid to the pesticide industry within the commercial determinants of health (CDOH) field. We conducted a scoping review to map practices adopted by the pesticide industry to influence science and policymaking and to assess the breadth and focus of the associated literature. We included 31 documents and categorized the extracted data using a typology of commercial practices. The documents described how major pesticide companies, and their trade bodies, have acted to influence science and maintain favourable regulatory environments while undermining the credibility of researchers and agencies that publish findings threatening to their commercial interests. A large proportion of the literature consists of historical analyses, narrative reviews, commentaries/perspective pieces, and investigative reports published in the grey literature, predominantly informed by analysis of internal industry documents and freedom of information requests. Most studies focus on high-income settings. There were a limited number of primary peer-reviewed empirical studies that explicitly aimed to study the practices of the pesticide industry from a CDOH perspective. However, our findings show that major pesticide companies adopt political and scientific practices highly similar to other HHIs. The review shows a critical need for research on the pesticide industry’s current practices in low- and middle-income countries where the negative impacts of its activities on health and the environment are likely to be more marked.
KW - pesticide industry
KW - pesticides
KW - commercial determinants of health
KW - public health policy
KW - conflicts of interest
KW - commercial practices
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf001
U2 - 10.1093/heapro/daaf001
DO - 10.1093/heapro/daaf001
M3 - Article
SN - 0957-4824
VL - 40
JO - Health Promotion International
JF - Health Promotion International
IS - 1
M1 - daaf001
ER -