Maternal Views on RSV Vaccination During the First Season of Implementation in England and Scotland

Thomas C Williams, Robin Marlow, Steve Cunningham, Simon B Drysdale, Helen Groves, Dalia Iskander, Xinxue Liu, Mark D Lyttle, Chengetai D. Mpamhanga, Shaun O'Hagan, Thomas Waterfield, Damian Roland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in infants less than 6 months old, resulting in an estimated 1.4 million hospital admissions each year worldwide1. A maternal bivalent RSV prefusion F protein–based (RSVpreF) vaccine was introduced to the United Kingdom routine immunization schedule in the summer of 2024; this was offered as part of antenatal care by midwife led maternity services (Scotland and England), and in some areas, in primary care also (England only). The impact of such a vaccine will depend not just on the effectiveness of the vaccine itself, but also on uptake of the vaccine by recipients. As part of the BronchStop vaccine effectiveness study2 we conducted a survey of mothers eligible for RSV vaccination whose infants had been admitted to hospital with bronchiolitis or a LRTI, designing a questionnaire around the 5Cs of vaccine hesitancy (for further details of study design see Supplementary File 2). Here we present initial results from this survey to facilitate counselling of pregnant women who are offered the RSVpreF vaccination and inform vaccine uptake strategies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e135-e136
JournalThe Lancet Infectious Diseases
Volume25
Issue number3
Early online date29 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Jan 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Maternal Views on RSV Vaccination During the First Season of Implementation in England and Scotland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this