TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring population health
T2 - A review of indicators
AU - Etches, Vera
AU - Frank, John
AU - Di Ruggiero, Erica
AU - Manuel, Doug
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/4/21
Y1 - 2006/4/21
N2 - This article reviews the historical development of population health indicators. We have long known that environmental, socioeconomic, early life conditions, individual actions, and medical care all interact to affect health. Present quantitative reporting on the impact of these factors on population health grew out Bills of Mortality published in the 1500s. Since then, regular censuses, civil registration of vital statistics, and international classification systems have improved data quality and comparability. Regular national health interview surveys and application of administrative data contributed information on morbidity, health services use, and some social determinants of health. More recently, traditional health databases and datasets on "nonhealth" sector determinants have been linked. Statistical methods for map-making, risk adjustment, multilevel analysis, calculating population-attributable risks, and summary measures of population health have further helped to integrate information. Reports on the health of populations remain largely confined to focused areas. This paper suggests a conceptual framework for using indicators to report on all the domains of population health. Future ethical development of indicators will incorporate principles of justice, transparency, and effectiveness.
AB - This article reviews the historical development of population health indicators. We have long known that environmental, socioeconomic, early life conditions, individual actions, and medical care all interact to affect health. Present quantitative reporting on the impact of these factors on population health grew out Bills of Mortality published in the 1500s. Since then, regular censuses, civil registration of vital statistics, and international classification systems have improved data quality and comparability. Regular national health interview surveys and application of administrative data contributed information on morbidity, health services use, and some social determinants of health. More recently, traditional health databases and datasets on "nonhealth" sector determinants have been linked. Statistical methods for map-making, risk adjustment, multilevel analysis, calculating population-attributable risks, and summary measures of population health have further helped to integrate information. Reports on the health of populations remain largely confined to focused areas. This paper suggests a conceptual framework for using indicators to report on all the domains of population health. Future ethical development of indicators will incorporate principles of justice, transparency, and effectiveness.
KW - Epidemiological methods
KW - Ethics
KW - Framework
KW - History
KW - Public health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645809962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102141
DO - 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102141
M3 - Review article
C2 - 16533108
AN - SCOPUS:33645809962
VL - 27
SP - 29
EP - 55
JO - Annual Review of Public Health
JF - Annual Review of Public Health
SN - 0163-7525
ER -