Measuring the effect of watch-preceded and direct rating changes: A note on credit markets

Florian Kiesel, Sascha Kolaric*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper analyzes the importance of distinguishing between watch-preceded and direct rating changes for the credit default swap (CDS) market by examining a total of 2991 rating change announcements, 1526 watchlist placement announcements, and 430 rating affirmations following watchlist placements. The results show that watch-preceded downgrades do not lead to significant CDS market reactions, while direct downgrades are associated with a significant increase in CDS spread levels. Likewise, we document that watchlist placements for downgrade lead to increases in firms’ CDS spreads. CDS markets do not react to rating upgrades but watchlist placements for upgrade result in an immediate decrease in CDS spreads. Rating affirmations following watchlist placements for downgrade lead to slight reductions in CDS spreads, while affirmations following watchlist placements for upgrade have no effect on CDS spreads. These findings demonstrate the importance for empirical research on the interaction between credit markets and rating announcements to differentiate between watch-preceded and direct rating changes, particularly for rating downgrades.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)653-672
JournalReview of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Volume50
Issue number2
Early online date18 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • credit default swaps (CDS)
  • credit rating
  • credit watchlist
  • credit quality
  • event study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring the effect of watch-preceded and direct rating changes: A note on credit markets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this