TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanical Properties of Dense Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks (ZIFs): A High-Pressure X-ray Diffraction, Nanoindentation and Computational Study of the Zinc Framework Zn(Im)(2), and its Lithium-Boron Analogue, LiB(Im)(4)
AU - Bennett, Thomas D.
AU - Tan, Jin-Chong
AU - Moggach, Stephen A.
AU - Galvelis, Raimondas
AU - Mellot-Draznieks, Caroline
AU - Reisner, Barbara A.
AU - Thirumurugan, A.
AU - Allan, David. R.
AU - Cheetham, Anthony K.
N1 - M1 - Copyright (C) 2012 American Chemical Society (ACS). All Rights Reserved.
CAPLUS AN 2010:1183324(Journal)
PY - 2010/9
Y1 - 2010/9
N2 - The dense, anhydrous zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), Zn(Im)(2) (1) and LiB(Im)(4) (2), adopt the same zni topology and differ only in terms of the inorganic species present in their structures. Their mechanical properties (specifically the Young's and bulk moduli, along with the hardness) have been elucidated by using high pressure, synchrotron X-ray diffraction, density functional calculations and nanoindentation studies. Under hydrostatic pressure, framework 2 undergoes a phase transition at 1.69 GPa, which is somewhat higher than the transition previously reported in 1. The Young's modulus (E) and hardness (H) of 1 (E approximate to 8.5, H approximate to 1 GPa) is substantially higher than that of 2 (E approximate to 3, H approximate to 0.1 GPa), whilst its bulk modulus is relatively lower (approximate to 14 GPa cf. approximate to 16.6 GPa). The heavier, zinc-containing material was also found to be significantly harder than its light analogue. The differential behaviour of the two materials is discussed in terms of the smaller pore volume of 2 and the greater flexibility of the LiN4 tetrathedron compared with the ZnN4 and BN4 units.
AB - The dense, anhydrous zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), Zn(Im)(2) (1) and LiB(Im)(4) (2), adopt the same zni topology and differ only in terms of the inorganic species present in their structures. Their mechanical properties (specifically the Young's and bulk moduli, along with the hardness) have been elucidated by using high pressure, synchrotron X-ray diffraction, density functional calculations and nanoindentation studies. Under hydrostatic pressure, framework 2 undergoes a phase transition at 1.69 GPa, which is somewhat higher than the transition previously reported in 1. The Young's modulus (E) and hardness (H) of 1 (E approximate to 8.5, H approximate to 1 GPa) is substantially higher than that of 2 (E approximate to 3, H approximate to 0.1 GPa), whilst its bulk modulus is relatively lower (approximate to 14 GPa cf. approximate to 16.6 GPa). The heavier, zinc-containing material was also found to be significantly harder than its light analogue. The differential behaviour of the two materials is discussed in terms of the smaller pore volume of 2 and the greater flexibility of the LiN4 tetrathedron compared with the ZnN4 and BN4 units.
KW - mechanical properties
KW - metal–organic frameworks
KW - microporous materials
KW - zeolite analogues
KW - zeolitic imidazolate framework
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956623369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/chem.201001415
DO - 10.1002/chem.201001415
M3 - Article
SN - 0947-6539
VL - 16
SP - 10684
EP - 10690
JO - Chemistry - A European Journal
JF - Chemistry - A European Journal
IS - 35
ER -