Medicines transparency at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the new information age: The perspectives of patients

Dominic Way, Ragnar Lofstedt, Frederic Bouder, Darrick Evensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The concept of transparency has gained widespread appeal in the European pharmaceutical domain, not least at the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Agency policies have two main objectives: (1) to enable the reuse of data (e.g. clinical study reports) and (2) to empower patients to directly and indirectly make more informed decisions on medicines. Past research has almost exclusively focused on the perspectives of external researchers intending to reanalyse data made publically available. Few studies, however, have explored what can be learnt from the perspectives of other actors (e.g. health care professionals, patients, the regulators themselves, industry and others). This empirical study explores the EMA’s transparency policies from the perspectives of patients. After presenting the results of a survey (N = 1010) with a sample of individuals diagnosed with five specific medical conditions (HIV/AIDS, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) from four EU countries (Germany, Spain, France and the UK), the authors argue that EMA’s transparency policies do not adequately address the real-world complexities of communicating with patients. In turn, the paper concludes that the perspective of patients provides an essential contribution to understanding the full net effects (positive, negative and/or limited) of EMA’s transparency policies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1185-1215
JournalJournal of risk research
Volume19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jul 2016

Keywords

  • transparency
  • patients
  • European Medicines Agency
  • pharmaceutical regulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Medicines transparency at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the new information age: The perspectives of patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this