Mercaptopurine versus placebo to prevent recurrence of Crohn's disease after surgical resection (TOPPIC): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial

TOPPIC Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Summary Background Up to 60% of patients with Crohn’s disease need intestinal resection within the fi rst 10 years of diagnosis, and postoperative recurrence is common. We investigated whether mercaptopurine can prevent or delay postoperative clinical recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Methods We did a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial at 29 UK secondary and tertiary hospitals of patients (aged >16 years in Scotland or >18 years in England and Wales) who had a confi rmed diagnosis of Crohn’s disease and had undergone intestinal resection. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated web-based randomisation system to oral daily mercaptopurine at a dose of 1 mg/kg bodyweight rounded to the nearest 25 mg or placebo; patients with low thiopurine methyltransferase activity received half the normal dose. Patients and their carers and physicians were masked to the treatment allocation. Patients were followed up for 3 years. The primary endpoint was clinical recurrence of Crohn’s disease (Crohn’s Disease Activity Index >150 plus 100-point increase in score) and the need for anti-infl ammatory rescue treatment or primary surgical intervention. Primary and safety analyses were by intention to treat. Subgroup analyses by smoking status, previous thiopurines, previous infl iximab or methotrexate, previous surgery, duration of disease, or age at diagnosis were also done. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register (ISRCTN89489788) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT number 2006-005800-15). Findings Between June 6, 2008, and April 23, 2012, 240 patients with Crohn’s disease were randomly assigned: 128 to mercaptopurine and 112 to placebo. All patients received at least one dose of study drug, and no randomly assigned patients were excluded from the analysis. 16 (13%) of patients in the mercaptopurine group versus 26 (23%) patients in the placebo group had a clinical recurrence of Crohn’s disease and needed anti-infl ammatory rescue treatment or primary surgical intervention (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·54, 95% CI 0·27–1·06; p=0·07; unadjusted HR 0·53, 95% CI 0·28–0·99; p=0·046). In a subgroup analysis, three (10%) of 29 smokers in the mercaptopurine group and 12 (46%) of 26 in the placebo group had a clinical recurrence that needed treatment (HR 0·13, 95% CI 0·04–0·46), compared with 13 (13%) of 99 non-smokers in the mercaptopurine group and 14 (16%) of 86 in the placebo group (0·90, 0·42–1·94; pinteraction=0·018). The eff ect of mercaptopurine did not signifi cantly diff er from placebo for any of the other planned subgroup analyses (previous thiopurines, previous infl iximab or methotrexate, previous surgery, duration of disease, or age at diagnosis). The incidence and types of adverse events were similar in the mercaptopurine and placebo groups. One patient on placebo died of ischaemic heart disease. Adverse events caused discontinuation of treatment in 39 (30%) of 128 patients in the mercaptopurine group versus 41 (37%) of 112 in the placebo group. Interpretation Mercaptopurine is eff ective in preventing postoperative clinical recurrence of Crohn’s disease, but only in patients who are smokers. Thus, in smokers, thiopurine treatment seems to be justifi ed in the postoperative period, although smoking cessation should be strongly encouraged given that smoking increases the risk of recurrence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1
Number of pages10
JournalLancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Early online date30 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mercaptopurine versus placebo to prevent recurrence of Crohn's disease after surgical resection (TOPPIC): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this