Metallic hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus

N.D. Clement, D. MacDonald, G.F. Dall, I. Ahmed, A.D. Duckworth, H.S. Shalaby, J. McKinley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims
To examine the mid-term outcome and cost utility of the BioPro metallic hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of hallux rigidius.
Patients and Methods
We reviewed 97 consecutive BioPro metallic hemiarthroplasties performed in 80 patients for end-stage hallux rigidus, with a minimum follow-up of five years. There were 19 men and 61 women; their mean age was 55 years (22 to 74). No patient was lost to follow-up.
Results
A total of 12 patients (15 first metatarso-phalangeal joints (MTPJs)) required a revision; one for infection, two for osteolysis and 12 for pain. The all cause rate of survival at five years was 85.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83.5 to 87.9). Younger age was a significant predictor of revision (odds ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.17, p = 0.014) on excluding infection and adjusting for confounding variables (Cox regression). Significant improvements were demonstrated at five years in the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (13.9, 95% CI 10.5 to 17.2) and in the physical component of the Short Form-12 score (6.5, 95% CI 4.1 to 8.9). The overall rate of satisfaction was 75%. The cost per quality adjusted life year at five years, accounting for a 14% rate of revision was between £4431 and £6361 depending on the complexity and morbidity of the patient.
Conclusion
The BioPro hemiarthroplasty offers good short to mid-term functional outcome and is a cost effective intervention. The relatively high revision rate is associated with younger age and perhaps the use of this implant should be limited to older patients.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBone and Joint Journal
Volume98-B
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Metallic hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this