Methodological guidance for selecting buffers in greenspace and health studies

Mohammad Javad Zare Sakhvidi, Matthew H. E. M. Browning, Karl Samuelsson, S. M. Labib, Achilleas Psyllidis, A. Kofi Ameagah, Thomas Astell-Burt, Albert Bach, Michael Jerrett, Gregory N. Bratman, Matilda van den Bosch, Kees de Hoogh, Sjerp de Vries, Angel M. Dzhambov, Rohollah Fallah Madvan, Xiaoqi Feng, Amanda Fernandes, Elaine Fuertes, Vincenzo Giannico, Nelson GouveiaTerry Hartig, Joachim Heinrich, Perry Hystad, Jesus Ibarluzea, Benedicte Jacquemin, Peter James, Mahsa Jashri, Luke D. Knibbs, Pablo Knobel, Manolis Koegevinas, Aitana Lertxundi, Iana Markevych, Amirhooshang Mehrparvar, Mohammad Min, Richard Mitchel, Tim S. Nawrot, Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, Cristina O'Callaghan-Gordo, Jamie Pearce, Michelle Plusquin, Giovanni Sanesi, Jason G. Su, Margarita Triguero-Mas, Monica Ubalde, Antonia Valentin, Mathew P. White, Bo-Yi Yang, Jun Yang, Jinguang Zhang, Tianyu Zhao, Marco Helbich, Payam Dadvand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Greenspace can promote health via diverse pathways. A common approach to assessing greenspace exposure is to estimate vegetation availability within buffers surrounding locations where people reside or spend time. However, no clear framework for informed buffer selection exists, and choices made show considerable heterogeneity, impeding evidence synthesis and causal inference. In this Personal View conducted by an interdisciplinary panel of experts, we aimed to establish a framework for informed buffer selection for epidemiological studies on greenspace. We began by reviewing available approaches for the selection of buffer types, which range from single fixed-location approaches to high-resolution mobility-based activity-space approaches, as well as different buffer sizes. We then summarised the determinants of buffer type and size selection including health outcomes and underlying mechanisms, study population, contextual factors, and data characteristics. Finally, based on these determinants, we developed recommendations for future research. Buffer type and size selection should be hypothesis driven, reflecting presumed greenspace–health mechanisms. Buffer selection should target activity-based approaches where feasible, and multiple buffer sizes should be tested. Overall, the assessment of greenspace exposure should shift from ad-hoc approaches to personalised, multiscale, and context-specific methods. We call for standardising and reporting the rationale for buffer selection to minimise bias and enhance comparability and evidence synthesis across studies.
Original languageEnglish
Article number 101370
JournalThe Lancet Planetary Health
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Nov 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological guidance for selecting buffers in greenspace and health studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this