TY - JOUR
T1 - Microbial risk assessment for underground hydrogen storage in porous rocks
AU - Thaysen, Eike M.
AU - Armitage, Timothy
AU - Slabon, Lubica
AU - Hassanpouryouzband, Aliakbar
AU - Edlmann, Katriona
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to express our gratitude to the National Data repository for making the data available that enabled this research. Dr Edlmann, Dr Hassanpouryouzband and Dr Thaysen were supported by funding from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [Grant Number EP/S027815/1] (HyStorPor Project) and from the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (now Clean Hydrogen Partnership) under grant agreement No 101006632. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, Hydrogen Europe and Hydrogen Europe Research. Dr Slabon was funded by UK Research and Innovation as part of the EPSRC and NERC Industrial CDT for Offshore Renewable Energy (IDCORE), Grant number EP/S023933/1.
Funding Information:
We would like to express our gratitude to the National Data repository for making the data available that enabled this research. Dr Edlmann, Dr Hassanpouryouzband and Dr Thaysen were supported by funding from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [Grant Number EP/S027815/1] (HyStorPor Project) and from the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (now Clean Hydrogen Partnership) under grant agreement No 101006632. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, Hydrogen Europe and Hydrogen Europe Research. Dr Slabon was funded by UK Research and Innovation as part of the EPSRC and NERC Industrial CDT for Offshore Renewable Energy (IDCORE), Grant number EP/S023933/1.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/11/15
Y1 - 2023/11/15
N2 - Geological hydrogen storage, e.g. in depleted gas fields (DGF), can overcome imbalances between supply and demand in the renewable energy sector and facilitate the transition to a low carbon emissions society. A range of subsurface microorganisms utilise hydrogen, which may have important implications for hydrogen recovery, clogging and corrosion. We gathered temperature and salinity data for 75 DGF on the UK continental shelf and mapped their suitability for hydrogen storage in terms of the risk of adverse microbial effects, based on a novel collection of microbial growth constraints. Data on wind and solar operational capacities as well as offshore gas and condensate pipeline infrastructure were overlaid on the microbial risk categorization to optimize geographical centers of green hydrogen production, transport infrastructure and underground storage. We recommend storing hydrogen in 9 DGF that are at no microbial risk due to temperatures > 122 °C, or in the 35 low-risk DGF with temperatures > 90 °C. We recommend against utilising high-risk DGF with temperatures < 55 °C (9 DGF). Alignment with centers for renewable energy production and out-of-use pipelines suitable for repurposing to transport hydrogen suggests that no-risk and low-risk DGF in the Southern North Sea are the most suitable candidates for hydrogen storage. Our results advise site selection choices in geological hydrogen storage in the UK. Our methodology is applicable to any underground porous rock system globally.
AB - Geological hydrogen storage, e.g. in depleted gas fields (DGF), can overcome imbalances between supply and demand in the renewable energy sector and facilitate the transition to a low carbon emissions society. A range of subsurface microorganisms utilise hydrogen, which may have important implications for hydrogen recovery, clogging and corrosion. We gathered temperature and salinity data for 75 DGF on the UK continental shelf and mapped their suitability for hydrogen storage in terms of the risk of adverse microbial effects, based on a novel collection of microbial growth constraints. Data on wind and solar operational capacities as well as offshore gas and condensate pipeline infrastructure were overlaid on the microbial risk categorization to optimize geographical centers of green hydrogen production, transport infrastructure and underground storage. We recommend storing hydrogen in 9 DGF that are at no microbial risk due to temperatures > 122 °C, or in the 35 low-risk DGF with temperatures > 90 °C. We recommend against utilising high-risk DGF with temperatures < 55 °C (9 DGF). Alignment with centers for renewable energy production and out-of-use pipelines suitable for repurposing to transport hydrogen suggests that no-risk and low-risk DGF in the Southern North Sea are the most suitable candidates for hydrogen storage. Our results advise site selection choices in geological hydrogen storage in the UK. Our methodology is applicable to any underground porous rock system globally.
KW - Adverse microbial effects
KW - Geological storage
KW - Hydrogen
KW - Renewable energy production centres
KW - Risk analysis
KW - Site selection
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236125028236?via%3Dihub
U2 - 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128852
DO - 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128852
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85164312671
SN - 0016-2361
VL - 352
JO - Fuel
JF - Fuel
M1 - 128852
ER -