Miracles and the uniformity of nature

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

This chapter looks critically at the prevailing modern understanding of miracle, adapted from David Hume, where a miracle is a transgression by the Deity of a law of nature. I suggest that this stock understanding informs the widespread secular naturalism of our day, where the metaphysical concept of laws of nature becomes, in effect, the benchmark of reality. I question the utility of this view for establishing a meaningful view of nature and of the natural sciences, and look again at David Hume’s philosophy of induction. This leads me to highlight the ‘uniformity of nature’ as a more flexible concept by which to unify the sciences and to define miracle. I use the example of contemporary earth science to discuss how uniformity has informed scientific practice and scientific unity, and I suggest some ways in which the concept of miracle is both transformed and is transformative in this view.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMiracles
Subtitle of host publicationAn Exercise in Comparative Philosophy of Religion
EditorsKaren Zwier, David Weddle, Timothy Knepper
PublisherSpringer
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2021

Publication series

NameComparative Philosophy of Religion
PublisherSpringer
ISSN (Print)2522-0020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Miracles and the uniformity of nature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this